was last modified: January 17th, 2017 by MilMasAdmin

The FERES doctrine and military medical malpractice cases

The FERES doctrine and military medical malpractice cases

“The FERES doctrine is a U.S. law from a longstanding U.S. Supreme Court case which prevents active duty service men and women from successfully pursuing an FTCA claim or lawsuit, and a MCA claim, when the medical care that is the subject of the military medical malpractice was received “incident” to their service. In practical terms, if a military service member receives the military treatment because of their military status, Feres prohibits that active duty service man or women from pursuing a military medical malpractice claim or lawsuit against the government.

The Feres doctrine may also prohibit “derivative” claims of a military members family members. For example, a spouse could not successfully pursue a wrongful death claim of her service member husband who died as a result of military medical care he received incident to his service. However, the converse is not true; the Feres doctrine would not prohibit a “derivative” wrongful death claim of a military service member when his spouse died as a result of military medical care that she received incident to his military service. The difference is her civilian dependent status v. his active duty status.

Retirees, like civilian dependents, are not prohibited by the Feres doctrine from pursuing medical malpractice claims against the military health care system. This includes both the retired military member and their spouse. The difference is their status as
retired vs. active military members. Retirees and their spouses enjoy the right of not only filing a claim for negligent care against themselves, but could also file a derivative claim for their other spouses injuries, regardless of which one served in the military.

One unique situation should be mentioned. When an active duty service member delivers a baby who is injured as a result of military medical malpractice that occurred during her pregnancy, there is some difference in the law as to whether she and the child can successfully pursue a claim. In this situation, a primary claim of the child, and derivative claims of the parents, should always be filed so as to preserve a potentially successful claim or lawsuit.”

2 Comments

  1. Usually I do not read article on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very compelled
    me to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has been surprised
    me. Thanks, very nice article.

    Reply
  2. Howdy I am so grateful I found your webpage, I really
    found you by error, while I was browsing on Digg for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a incredible post and a
    all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to read through it all at the minute but
    I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I
    have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the superb work.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Miller MasciolaTestimonials

We couldn’t have better said it our selves, so here what our customers say about us.
  • Johnny and I couldn’t be happier with the medical malpractice case resolution and the security that the settlement you negotiated brings to our family, especially our baby daughter. We are loving being parents, still getting use to feedings, lack of sleep, diapers, etc., – but all so rewarding and worth it beyond words. Take care and thanks for everything you have done for us!
    Joan D.
    Rating
    Peter is a very good attorney who is well versed in the Military Medical Malpractice field. He handled my case with his expertise along with his compassionate, caring and considerate manner. I was seeking answers as to what caused my husband’s death. Throughout the year long legal process, Peter guided me through the steps to provide all the pertinent information and medical records as well as explaining what I should expect regarding how long the process would take and his anticipated outcome. As a result of his expert handling of my case, he was able to obtain much of the missing information as well as a financial settlement. This was a very traumatic experience for me, yet with Peter’s support and encouragement, we prevailed with a positive settlement of my case. I would encourage anyone in need of legal support to contact Peter, you will have a very positive experience.
    DK
    Rating